Current:Home > MarketsSupreme Court refuses to hear bite mark case -USAMarket
Supreme Court refuses to hear bite mark case
View
Date:2025-04-18 16:26:17
MONTGOMERY, Ala. (AP) — The U.S. Supreme Court declined Tuesday to review the case of an Alabama man who has spent decades in prison for a murder conviction supported by recanted and discredited testimony about bite marks.
Charles M. McCrory was convicted of murder for the 1985 killing of his wife, Julie Bonds, who was found beaten to death in her home. Key evidence against him was the testimony of a forensic odontologist who said that two small marks on the victim’s left shoulder matched McCrory’s teeth. The odontologist later said he “fully” recants that 1985 testimony. He wrote in an affidavit that modern science has exposed the limitations of bite mark evidence and that there is no way to positively link the marks to any one person.
Lawyers with the Innocence Project and the Southern Center for Human Rights, which are representing McCrory, had asked the Supreme Court to review an Alabama court’s decision denying his request for a new trial. Justices turned down the petition mostly without comment.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote in a statement that the case raises “difficult questions about the adequacy of current postconviction remedies to correct a conviction secured by what we now know was faulty science.”
“One in four people exonerated since 1989 were wrongfully convicted based on false or misleading forensic evidence introduced at their trials. Hundreds if not thousands of innocent people may currently be incarcerated despite a modern consensus that the central piece of evidence at their trials lacked any scientific basis,” Sotomayor wrote.
Sotomayor wrote that she voted against reviewing the case because the constitutional question raised by McCrory has not “percolated sufficiently in the lower courts.” But she urged state and federal lawmakers to establish paths for inmates to challenge “wrongful convictions that rest on repudiated forensic testimony.”
The Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals, in rejecting his bid for a new trial, ruled that McCrory had failed to show that result of his 1985 trial “probably would have been different” if the new forensic guidelines regarding bite marks had been used.
The Innocence Project says that least 36 people have been wrongfully convicted through the use of bite mark evidence. A Florida man was freed in 2020 after spending 37 years in a Florida prison for a 1983 rape and murder he did not commit. The conviction was based partly on faulty bite mark analysis.
Bonds was found beaten to death May 31, 1985, in the home she shared with her toddler son. The couple were divorcing and lived separately at the time. McCrory has maintained his innocence. He told police that he had been at the home the night before to do laundry and say goodnight to his son. His attorneys argued that there was no physical evidence linking McCrory to the crime and that hair found clutched in the decedent’s hand did not belong to McCrory.
Bonds’ family, who believed McCrory was responsible, hired private prosecutors for the case against McCrory. They hired Florida forensic dentist Dr. Richard Souviron, who gained fame as an expert after testifying in the trial of serial killer Ted Bundy. McCrory was convicted and sentenced to life in prison.
Souviron later recanted his testimony. McCrory’s attorneys said two other forensic experts disputed that the marks were bite marks at all.
McCrory’s attorneys wrote in their petition that that the current district attorney had offered to resentence Mr. McCrory to time served, which would allow him to immediately leave prison, in exchange for a guilty plea.
“Mr. McCrory declined, unwilling to admit to a crime he did not commit,” his attorneys wrote.
McCrory was denied parole in 2023. He will be eligible again in 2028.
veryGood! (1265)
Related
- Trump suggestion that Egypt, Jordan absorb Palestinians from Gaza draws rejections, confusion
- Taylor Swift and Peso Pluma make history, Shakira's return, more top moments from 2023 MTV VMAs
- Dozens of crocodiles escape after heavy floods in Chinese city
- Jim Trotter alleges NFL racial discrimination. His claims are huge problem for the league.
- Rams vs. 49ers highlights: LA wins rainy defensive struggle in key divisional game
- Mega Millions jackpot grows to $141 million. See winning numbers for Sept. 12 drawing.
- Thailand’s government, seeking return of tourists from China, approves visa-free entry for 5 months
- Japan’s Kishida shuffles Cabinet and party posts to solidify power
- Are Instagram, Facebook and WhatsApp down? Meta says most issues resolved after outages
- Republican lawmaker proposes 18% cap on credit card interest rates
Ranking
- In ‘Nickel Boys,’ striving for a new way to see
- Poccoin: Prospects of Blockchain Technology in the Internet of Things (IOT) Sector
- Sharna Burgess Shares Shock of Not Being Asked Back for Dancing With the Stars Season 32
- Mystery body found in Arizona in 1996 identified as veteran from Los Angeles area
- Why members of two of EPA's influential science advisory committees were let go
- 4 reasons why your car insurance premium is soaring
- How Kim’s meeting with Putin at Russian spaceport may hint at his space and weapons ambitions
- Tom Sandoval Details Filming Isolating Vanderpump Rules Season After Raquel Leviss Scandal
Recommendation
Moving abroad can be expensive: These 5 countries will 'pay' you to move there
Jim Trotter alleges NFL racial discrimination. His claims are huge problem for the league.
NSYNC reunites at VMAs, gives Taylor Swift award: 'You’re pop personified'
Zillow Gone Wild coming to HGTV with new show inspired by popular Instagram account
Warm inflation data keep S&P 500, Dow, Nasdaq under wraps before Fed meeting next week
The Sweet Way Taylor Swift & Selena Gomez Proved They're Each Other's Biggest Fans at the 2023 MTV VMAs
Hudson River swimmer deals with fatigue, choppy water, rocks and pollution across 315 miles
Lidcoin: a16z plans to advance US Crypto legislation