Current:Home > MyFederal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas -USAMarket
Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
View
Date:2025-04-17 05:29:33
A federal court on Wednesday affirmed a federal judge’s 2021 ruling imposing a $14.25 million penalty on Exxon Mobil for thousands of violations of the federal Clean Air Act at the company’s refinery and chemical plant complex in Baytown.
The decision by a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals rejects Exxon’s latest appeal, closing over a decade of litigation since the Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued the company in 2010.
“This ruling affirms a bedrock principle of constitutional law that people who live near pollution-spewing industrial facilities have a personal stake in holding polluters accountable for non-compliance with federal air pollution limits, and therefore have a right to sue to enforce the Clean Air Act as Congress intended,” Josh Kratka, managing attorney at the National Environmental Law Center and a lead lawyer on the case, said in a statement.
From 2005 to 2013, a federal judge found in 2017, Exxon’s refinery and chemical plants in Baytown released 10 million pounds of pollution beyond its state-issued air permits, including carcinogenic and toxic chemicals. U.S. District Judge David Hittner ordered Exxon to pay $19.95 million as punishment for exceeding air pollution limits on 16,386 days.
“We’re disappointed in this decision and considering other legal options,” an Exxon spokesperson said in response to the ruling.
Baytown sits 25 miles outside of Houston, with tens of thousands of people living near Exxon’s facility.
Exxon appealed and asked Hittner to re-examine how the fine was calculated, including by considering how much money the company saved by delaying repairs that would’ve prevented the excess air emissions in the first place. The company also argued that it had presented sufficient evidence to show that emissions were unavoidable.
In 2021, Hittner reduced the fine to $14.25 million — the largest penalty imposed by a court out of a citizen-initiated lawsuit under the Clean Air Act, according to Environment Texas. Exxon appealed again, challenging the plaintiffs’ standing to bring the lawsuit.
While a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed Hittner’s 2021 decision on Wednesday, seven members of the 17-judge panel also said they would have upheld the $19.95 million fine.
“The principal issue before the en banc Court is whether Plaintiffs’ members, who live, work, and recreate near Exxon’s facility, have a sufficient ‘personal stake’ in curtailing Exxon’s ongoing and future unlawful emissions of hazardous pollutants,” the judges wrote in a concurring opinion. “We conclude that the district court correctly held that Plaintiffs established standing for each of their claims and did not abuse its discretion in awarding a penalty of $19.95 million against Exxon to deter it from committing future violations.”
The Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued Exxon under a provision in the federal Clean Air Act that allows citizens to sue amid inaction by state and federal environmental regulators. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality rarely penalizes companies for unauthorized air emissions, a Texas Tribune investigation found.
“People in Baytown and Houston expect industry to be good neighbors,” Luke Metzger, executive director of Environment Texas, said in a statement. “But when companies violate the law and put health-threatening pollution into neighborhoods, they need to be held accountable.”
___
This story was originally published by The Texas Tribuneand distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
veryGood! (4)
Related
- Trump's 'stop
- The questions about Biden’s age and fitness are reminiscent of another campaign: Reagan’s in 1984
- Police fatally shoot suspect allegedly holding hostages at South Dakota gas station
- Los Angeles to pay $21M to settle claims over botched fireworks detonation by police 3 years ago
- How to watch the 'Blue Bloods' Season 14 finale: Final episode premiere date, cast
- Florida grower likely source in salmonella outbreak tied to cucumbers, FDA, CDC say
- Man suffers severe shark bite on South Padre Island during July Fourth celebrations
- Mega Millions winning numbers for July 2 drawing: Jackpot grows to $162 million
- 'As foretold in the prophecy': Elon Musk and internet react as Tesla stock hits $420 all
- Man suffers severe shark bite on South Padre Island during July Fourth celebrations
Ranking
- The White House is cracking down on overdraft fees
- Avian flu confirmed in a Colorado farmworker, marking fourth human case in U.S. since March
- Abortion on the ballot: Amarillo set to vote on abortion travel ban this election
- Separated by duty but united by bond, a pair of Marines and their K-9s are reunited for the first time in years
- A South Texas lawmaker’s 15
- 4 major takeaways from the Supreme Court's most consequential term in years
- Q&A: How a Land Purchase Inspired by an Unfulfilled Promise Aims to Make People of Color Feel Welcome in the Wilderness
- Is there life on another planet? Gliese 12b shows some promise. | The Excerpt
Recommendation
Buckingham Palace staff under investigation for 'bar brawl'
Bridgerton Casting Director Receives Unsolicited X-Rated Audition Videos Daily
Northern California wildfire does not grow but winds and hot weather could whip up flames
Mandy Moore Shares Pregnancy Melasma Issues
Civic engagement nonprofits say democracy needs support in between big elections. Do funders agree?
Pennsylvania Senate passes bill encouraging school districts to ban students’ phone use during day
Is there life on another planet? Gliese 12b shows some promise. | The Excerpt
LeBron James reaches two-year agreement to remain with Lakers and team up with son, Bronny